April 2, 2009

John Christopher: The Death of Grass

Posted in Christopher John, Penguin Modern Classics at 8:00 am by John Self

The Death of Grass (1956) has been praised highly by trusted sources on the blogosphere, and so when I learned that Penguin were to reissue the book as a Modern Classic, my curiosity was all the more piqued. This is a welcome addition to Penguin’s lengthening list of the genres which contain classics. The back cover of a 1970 film tie-in edition proclaims that the book “invites comparison with the novels of John Wyndham.” OK, here we go then: it’s not as good as the novels of John Wyndham. (Well, they did invite it.)

The main problem is that it’s not very well written, and it’s no surprise to read in the new introduction by Robert Macfarlane that the book was written “in ‘a matter of weeks’, with revisions being made only to the first chapter.” The opening scenes are full of people telling each other things for the benefit of the reader, and few of the characters are strongly distinguished – though there are a couple, such as the firearms store owner, Pirrie, who stand out. There’s an inevitably dated quality too (“There’s an awful lot of Chinks in China. They’ll breed ‘em back again in a couple of generations”).

Nonetheless The Death of Grass is a gripping story. It might be considered a sort of prequel to Cormac McCarthy’s The Road – less evolved in both chronological and literary terms – as the world succumbs to a virus which kills off all grasses around the world and leads to the breakdown of civilisation. The main storyline details the attempts by one family to journey the length of England to find a safe haven in a relative’s farm. Their travels coincide with the swift development of barbarism and violence among the British people.

There is plenty missing here: little description to evoke the image of a world without fields or crops, and only the odd reference to mass suicide or panic.

‘Did you ever see those old pictures of the rabbit plagues in Australia? Wire-netting fences ten feet high, and rabbits – hundreds, thousands of rabbits – piled up against them, leap-frogging over each other until in the end they scaled the fences or the fences went down under their weight. That’s Hong Kong right now, except that it’s not rabbits piled against the fence but human beings.’

At the same time where the book surpasses Wyndham is in the lack of cosiness elsewhere – characters do not hesitate to turn violent, and the closing scenes provide satisfying turns in the narrative. There is also the occasional nice image, as in one character’s anticipation of remembrance:

There will be legends, he thought, of broad avenues celestially lit, of the hurrying millions who lived together without plotting each other’s deaths, of railway trains and aeroplanes and motor-cars, of food in all its diversity. Most of all, perhaps, of policemen – custodians, without anger or malice, of a law that stretched to the ends of the earth.

(That last sentence contains within it a pretty cosy presumption to begin with.)

The book is also suitably depressing, particularly with environmental and social breakdown seeming ever more relevant topics. (A common conception: the end of the world always seems more imminent than it did a few decades ago.) The moral voice of the narrative is contained in one paragraph early in the book, when a character says:

‘In a way, I think it would be more right for the virus to win, anyway. For years now, we’ve treated the land as though it were a piggy-bank, to be raided. And the land, after all, is life itself.’

Robert Macfarlane’s introduction places the book in the mid-20th century tradition of the ‘floral apocalypse’ story, detailing Triffids but also less well known examples as Thomas Disch’s The Genocides and Ward Moore’s Greener Than You Think (and, less obviously, it occurs to me, Brian Aldiss’s Hothouse). John Christopher, whose real name is Samuel Youd and who is in his 87th year, has written around 70 novels under several different names. Given his rampant – virus-like – productivity, the real surprise is that The Death of Grass is as good as it is.


add to del.icio.us : Digg it : Stumble It! :  : post to facebook

About these ads

23 Comments »

  1. Interesting, I didn’t know of Disch’s The Genocides (though his The Trees, if I recall the title correctly, is remarkably depressing).

    I may read this as it’s been unavailable so long and is widely regarded, though I wouldn’t call yours a glowing review quite. Is it an easy read John? I don’t necessarily mind a slight lack of literary quality, but I do if it’s associated with excessive length or a turgid style.

  2. Sam Jordison said,

    I missed that this had been re-released. Damn! Interesting review… Good stuff.

    I read the book when 11 and it blew my tiny mind… I didn’t notice the faults you point out then, of course (although I think the Chink stuff might have registered – I was a very right-on child)

    I’d be really fascinated to look at it again, especially after reading this. So thanks!

    • John Self said,

      Sam Jordison writes on revisiting The Death of Grass for the Guardian books blog, and finds that “it has only improved with age.”

  3. John Self said,

    Is it an easy read John?

    A very easy read, Max, and just under 200 pages in length. (Even easier for me, in fact, as I read it in a spiral-bound proof copy which I could leave open on my lap or desk with no hands required. More books should be like this!) Any more info on Disch, by the way?

    My review is not glowing because the book is, as indicated above, not well written. However it does seem to me to be one of those rare examples where the functional nature of the writing does not interfere with the main qualities – the bleakness, the direction, the pace – and may even be helpful to them.

    Sam, it’s out today, and should be widely available. I think it will do very well, because as you yourself have pointed out, it’s a book many people recall from their youth – though I hadn’t heard of it until bloggers started raving about it in the last year or two. My only knowledge of Christopher’s work was his Tripods series, which will be known to many people around my age from the TV adaptation in the 1980s.

    It also of course has an environmental relevance which is in keeping with the times, as with the other recent Penguin Modern Classic sci-fi title, Make Room! Make Room!

  4. Demob Happy said,

    I’m sure we’re due a spate of a new apocalyptic novels like this, now that the world is melting down economically as well as environmentally.

    Following on from what you said about The Road, I’m reading Blood Meridian at the moment and in many ways it is the more apocalyptic and transgressive of the two novels, even if it has a historical premise. Most of McCarthy’s novels seem to take place on the threshold of civilisation: not the end of the planet itself but the end of eras, past or present.

  5. I see Blood Meridian and The Road as Cormac McCarthy’s book-ends for American civilization. It started with a pile of corpses, and it’s going to end with a pile of corpses. You can always rely on McCarthy for a cheerful and uplifting summer read…

  6. JRSM said,

    Very good review. It’s hard for me to see this book’s flaws as, like Sam, I read it first as a youngster, and it was the atmosphere and gripping plot that grabbed me. I still think it’s ace.

    Thomas Disch is well worth a look, but don’t start with ‘The Genocides’. His later work, like ‘Camp Concentration’, is much more layered, allusive and intriguing. ‘The Genocides’ is straight 1950s pulp about giant plants taking over the world, and a bunch of American farm-boy types trying to save themselves–like a more bumptiously American and less full-of-wonders version of ‘Hothouse’, in fact.

  7. Steerforth said,

    I don’t know if you heard the serialised Radio Four dramatisation recently, but I felt it baldly exposed the rather clunky dialogue.

    I broadly agree with your conclusions. ‘The Death of Grass’ isn’t a literary masterpiece, but a highly accomplished work of popular fiction by a extremely underrated novelist. I hope that John Christopher will now begin to receive the recognition he deserves.

  8. Tom C said,

    I just ordered this yesterday having read a review in the Guardian. A great review – my expectations are lowered slightly, but I am still looking forward to reading it

  9. John Self said,

    Thanks for the comments everyone. Yes Tom, I thought the Guardian review was a bit effusive and likely to lead to dashed expectations. The Death of Grass is a good read and a worthy reissue, but it’s futile to pretend that it’s flawless.

    I must read some more Cormac McCarthy. I don’t think I’ve managed to finish any of his books other than The Road. I did go through a burst of enthusiasm for him when All the Pretty Horses came out back in the 1990s, and picked up most of his books then, and tried Blood Meridian and Horses without much joy.

  10. Tom C said,

    It arrived last week and I raced through it. My review here, and thanks for bringing the book to my attention

    http://www.acommonreader.org.uk/2009/05/deathgrass.html

  11. John Self said,

    Thanks Tom – a great, balanced review. Glad to have been of service!

  12. Martyn Oliver said,

    Thanks for this review. I’ve just picked up John Wyndham’s “Kraken Wakes” (very interesting in the context of sea-level rise; have you read “After London” by Richard Jefferies, on a similar theme, by the way?) and this prompted me to think back to other apocalyptic novels.

    In common with others, I read “Grass” during my teens in the late 60s, and it had a profound effect upon me. Among other things, I learned or was taught a whole series of Ray Mears-type survival skills, just in case. None of them have been of much use to me yet, but you never know …

    Anyway, on the strength of your review (and that of Tom C, linked above), I’m going to re-read “Grass”

  13. John Self said,

    Thanks Martyn. Yes, The Kraken Wakes is interesting, sort of Triffids-by-Sea. I thought the stuff about how people and media respond to the crisis was as interesting as the crisis itself. Funny you should mention After London, as I know I’ve read about it somewhere very recently, but I’m damned if I can remember where.

    • Martyn Oliver said,

      In fact, I think that is probably what Wyndham was writing about. His crises were never the stuff of pulp SF, but were somehow all the more real because of their low-key nature. I reckon he didn’t want to distract readers from the more important things, the social aspects that you refer to: what happens when the most normal and predictable of societies is confronted by the unpredictable?

      We shall see!

  14. It was here John, I mentioned After London in the context of a discussion in your comments section about the impact of epublishing, noting that I had an ecopy but had ordered a POD version anyway as I was enjoying it and there are still real benefits to the printed word.

    Kraken is one of my favourite Wyndhams, it has a marvellous sequence at a dinner party, where some worldy-wise couple condescendingly explain how it’s all the work of the Soviets and that the protagonists are naive to believe what the papers are saying. All against a backdrop of blatant alien incursion and apocalypse.

    It may be cosy, but as catastrophes go I found its images of waters lapping up an abandoned London, and of an alien invasion in which we are outclassed to the point that they barely bother interacting with us, very powerful.

    On McCarthy, the only one I’ve read was No Country for Old Men, a couple of years back now I think. That was very good, so that may be worth your giving a go.

  15. Martyn Oliver said,

    “Kraken is one of my favourite Wyndhams, it has a marvellous sequence at a dinner party, where some worldy-wise couple condescendingly explain how it’s all the work of the Soviets … ”

    Is this Wyndham with tongue in cheek? I suspect so; but this was the 1950s after all. At the moment I’m working on a series of reprints of Bertrand Russell from the same period. I have a great respect for him as a common-sense thinker, but his take on Communism, and Communist Russia in particular, verges on the rabid.

    Incidentally, Russell’s approach to women is one of ignoring them. His thoughts on education, for example, are without exception directed at “the boy”. Compare this to Wyndham, in whose novels the women are always by far the brighter, more cogent thinkers. Was Wyndham a proto-feminist?

  16. I think it’s definitely satirical, of dinner party conversation, of those who think they’re plugged into some ral truth the rest of us are too dumb to see, of a certain kind of English insularity too. It works in part because as a reader you know of course how wrong they are but as characters within the fiction they are infuriatingly sure of how right they are.

    In the interests of full disclosure though, I have a great love of Wyndham’s work, and the idea he might have been a proto-feminist I think might well have some truth in it.

  17. amner said,

    Just finished this, JS, and really really enjoyed it. I do like my apocalypse/last days novels, and this, although imbued with the ‘cosiness’ referenced above, genuinely packs a punch. Thinking a little too much about it last night was a rather worrying experience.

    As always, grand stuff sir.

  18. [...] be read today at all. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Ian McEwan: On Chesil BeachJohn Christopher: The Death of GrassJoan Didion: The Year of Magical ThinkingA Review of “On the [...]

  19. It seems I was misremembering my titles, what I remembered as The Trees was The Genocides, so I have read it.

    Profoundly depressing novel. Worth reading for the final paragraph alone. Extraordinarily bleak stuff.

  20. [...] never saw a copy though, so when John Self reviewed the new Penguin Modern Classics edition over at The Asylum I mentally added it to my to be purchased list. This last week, fancying a break as far from [...]

  21. [...] interpretation of Blindness has it that it – like The Death of Grass, or The Road, or all the others – shows how fragile our civilisation is, and how always close [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,556 other followers

%d bloggers like this: