May 28, 2009
Hugo Wilcken: Colony
Hugo Wilcken’s second novel Colony was published in the UK straight into paperback in 2007. Saddled by a hopeless cover, lost in the sea of novels published each year, it sank, so far as I can tell, without trace. Or almost without trace. I caught mention of it on Steve Mitchelmore’s blog (“a compelling flight into the unknown … a terrific read”); if one – impossible – way of differentiating the novels in that sea is to read them all, another is to rely on trusted sources. So I picked up a copy about 18 months ago, and left it to languish (that hopeless cover!). It took a couple of days of planes and hotels, without the distractions of other books, to make me read it at last. I was amazed.
Colony was described by Wilcken before publication as “sort of Papillon meets Heart of Darkness.” Steve Mitchelmore saw Cormac McCarthy and Beckett. To those, let me add Damon Galgut, whose seductive combination of dry plotting and unreality are everywhere here. The book’s sometimes elusive nature seems to be reflected in the references to Poe’s Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym. But what impresses most is Wilcken’s unwillingness to try to impress the reader: the prose is unfussy, the scenes uncluttered. There is no ‘fine writing’. Instead, there is very fine writing indeed.
The theme of Colony is escape: from captivity to freedom, and vice versa; from reality into dreams and memories; from one identity to another; from life to elsewhere. It is apt that this is explored in a book which on the face of it has the escapist qualities of a thriller. Wilcken takes us to a penal colony in French Guiana in 1928, where “everyone’s got a scam.” Sabir is a new arrival, just off the boat where, after days of seasick rocking, the “absolute stillness feels as though something that had once been faintly alive has finally died.” The story follows Sabir’s progress in the colony, where the challenges are not just heat, exhaustion and violence, but relentless existence: “the past is dead, the future stolen away, the present an endless desert.” There is the struggle too with “imagination and memory. Which are always wrong. Always telling you what you want to hear.”
All this suggests a book which plays with the reality of its world, as in Christopher Priest’s The Affirmation. But to limit Colony to a genre or type would do it a disservice, as this is a book – as evidenced by the references it suggested to different people above – which unpacks in several different ways. It would also do a disservice to the book and its future readers – I hope there will be many – to outline the plot in any great detail, though I can say that there is a fundamental shift halfway through, and that we are helpfully told that one character “found he could consider two opposing notions and then accept both, without fundamentally believing in either”.
In some ways the characters seem stock types: the hardened criminal; the camp’s fixer; the idealistic commandant and his bored wife. Yet Wilcken’s no-nonsense style enables him to create scenes of great wonder and emotional heft, from death scenes to the tiniest – and therefore most potent – hints of a character’s previously unrevealed childhood. Past, present and future, and how they interconnect, are central to the book.
In any case, the various futures have already been lived out, played out, and all one can do is wearily continue along these set paths. Only the past remains obscure. It hasn’t happened and perhaps it never will.
Colony is an exceptional achievement whose overlooked status is little short of scandalous. If blogs can do one thing, it is to give deserving books like this life beyond their few weeks on the 3-for-2 tables. Having taken up Steve Mitchelmore’s endorsement of it, I can only urge others to do the same, and accept my inchoate view as a recommendation as strong as any I’ve given this year. If you read it and like it, spread the word yourself, by blog or word of mouth. This is a book I was sorry to leave, but simultaneously read through impatiently, keen to see where it would go. Where I will go next is to Wilcken’s first novel, The Execution. “Always a sense of anguish with every departure, however desired.”
Buy Colony from the Book Depository, Amazon (UK or US) or Waterstone’s
William Rycroft said,
May 28, 2009 at 8:13 am
SOLD! (let’s watch that Sales rank…)
John Self said,
May 28, 2009 at 8:22 am
Well the Amazon sales rank at the minute is around 991,000, which couldn’t be hard to improve on. But of course I’d rather people bought it from the Book Depository, which wouldn’t affect the Amazon rank. I knew I should have installed one of those Book Depository affiliate buttons…
Matt said,
May 28, 2009 at 8:24 am
Cheers for the recommendation – just got it for a penny on Amazon. I see Wilcken also wrote a book on Bowie’s Low which looks intriguing.
Vivek Tejuja said,
May 28, 2009 at 8:26 am
Sounds brilliant!! Will definitely read it and spread the word. Thank you for the review.
JRSM said,
May 28, 2009 at 8:46 am
‘The Execution’ is really, really good. I read that when it came out in 2001, and looked out for his next book for some time, but it never showed up, and then I forgot about him. These writers who don’t churn out a book every 1-2 years! Now I must get ‘Colony’!
JRSM said,
May 28, 2009 at 8:50 am
Further to that, though, the wait can be really worth it. I read this little book called ‘The Breezes’ sometime in the 1990s, a genuinely hilarious black comedy about Ireland’s unluckiest family, and waited for the aothor’s next book for ages, Finally, in 2008, Joseph O’Neill writes ‘Netherland’ and everybody notices. Finally I can get my hadsn on his first book, ‘This is the Life’, rushed back into print.
John Self said,
May 28, 2009 at 8:52 am
Hooray JRSM, someone who’s read Wilcken! I have ordered The Execution and might even get the Bowie book, though probably when I’ve listened to Low a bit more. So easy to be a completist when the author has written only three books. (Yes, I read the first couple of pages of The Breezes when I saw it reissued the other week, and thought it amusing.)
I hope people like Colony and spread the word. Do report back, Vivek, Matt and anyone else. Think of this as an experiment in blog power. Of course, where I had middling expectations (one reliable blog review v practically no other coverage of the book), I may now be in danger of raising people’s expectations excessively. But it’s a risk I’m willing to take.
Mark Thwaite said,
May 28, 2009 at 9:16 am
Hi John,
Thanks for directing folk to The Book Depository (you can get Hugo’s book here: http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/book/9780007106486/Colony )
I think it would be hugely instructive fun to see if we can collectively move this into the bestseller charts (or, you know, at least get a coupla blogs talking about it!)
I’ll see if I can get an interview with Hugo too (who has been commenting on ReadySteadyBook.com on a recent piece I wrote about genre: http://www.readysteadybook.com/Blog.aspx?permalink=20090525073937 )
Two plugs in one comment. Nice!
markx
Mark Thwaite said,
May 28, 2009 at 9:31 am
Currently at sales rank of 309,361 on bookdepository.co.uk
I’ve added the book to the homepage and will review anon… and I’ve tweeted it too!
johngirvin said,
May 28, 2009 at 11:03 am
It sounds good actually, and that’s from a committed sci-fi fan. I did like Papillon though.
John Self said,
May 28, 2009 at 11:34 am
Oddly I haven’t read Papillon myself, John. And like many people, I struggled with Heart of Darkness. But they’re clearly good reference points for this one.
Good work Mark, I’d seen Hugo Wilcken’s comments on your blog, though I didn’t initially realise it was the same Hugo. I’d love to get people reading this book as I think it not only has high literary ambitions, but is also an extremely atmospheric and gripping read – it’s not too much to say that I couldn’t keep my hands off it for two or three days – so it should have a wide potential readership. It is a most deserving case for blog power, not only because it’s good but because it’s so unfairly obscure.
Incidentally its Amazon UK sales rank is now 4,633!
deucekindred said,
May 28, 2009 at 12:31 pm
If you’re interested Wilcken also wrote about David Bowie’s Low for the 33 1/3 – it is an excellent book and a great companion to the album.
dovegreyreader said,
May 28, 2009 at 1:05 pm
John, Mark et al, I really do applaud this endeavour but I suspect Steve Mitchelmore would be utterly horrified and probably head into acute apoplexy to find a book he’d endorsed then featured on the blog of the “Leni Riefensthal of Richard and Judy’s middle England” as he has rather dubiously labelled me.
I might do it no favours at all, I mean assuming I enjoyed it I’d be introducing it to thousands of ‘ordinary readers’:-)
Discuss…
John Self said,
May 28, 2009 at 1:16 pm
Ah but Hugo Wilcken would have no complaints I suspect, dgr – and more to the point, I think you and plenty of your readers (some of whom are also my readers!) would like the book. In the words of Mrs Doylegreyeader, Oh go on.
deucekindred, yes someone else mentioned the Bowie book, which I became aware of when scanning the net for (very little) info on Wilcken. Thanks for that.
It looks as though Colony’s Amazon rank has peaked at 3,500 today. Not that sales rank matters of course. Ahem.
Biblibio said,
May 28, 2009 at 2:27 pm
The bottom half of the cover is fine… and then you see the top. I think your theory as to why “Colony” fell through the cracks is probably right. With so many bad books making it to bestseller status simply based on clever packaging, there have to be good books disappearing. Of course, I haven’t read this book (wow, I seem so entirely illiterate in these comments!) so I can’t say for sure, but I’ll take your word for it.
And impressive work with the sales rank. That seems oddly… fast.
steve mitchelmore said,
May 28, 2009 at 3:54 pm
John, does your cover match the one shown online? My copy has the figures on the left and the barracks emerging from the right. The figures are also black silhouettes.
I have to say, I’ve always really liked the cover design! Its sparsity doesn’t give much away.
As for the John Carey fan endorsing the book, I hope nothing too inaccessible to the masses surging the gates of my intellectual literary Paradiso was found.
John Self said,
May 28, 2009 at 4:29 pm
Yes Steve, my cover is slightly different too as you indicate, though not so very different that I could be bothered scanning my own copy in. All the images of it online seem to be the same as the one above.
I have to admit too that I am in a minority re the cover – others on Twitter (where I’ve been busily plugging the book all day) agree with you.
charles said,
May 28, 2009 at 9:12 pm
I’d never heard of this book (and, being the offbeat kind of reader who knows when the next Josipovici is coming out but hasn’t read Ian McEwan for decades, feel embarrassed to say so). But this is a fierce recommendation. (The wonder of your reviews, John, is not just the acumen but the generosity, but I’ve learnt to read the appositional phrases – Lasdun’s book ‘is, IN PLACES, the best story collection I have read since …’ Here, no such qualifiers.) And it would be great to see what blog power and online selling can do. (More brackets, sorry, but it seems worth mentioning the absurdity and backwardness, given the intelligence of most blog reviews compared to what’s in the newspapers, of paperback editions preferring some nonsense Daily Express quote for the cover over an Asylum quote.) But I would, meekly, like to remind all that besides Amazon (boo; and please, their ratings are so random as to be nonsense) and Book Depository (hurray), there are independent booksellers too, with rates to pay, who may order in a couple of copies if you ask for one, and it would be nice if these got something out of this too.
John Self said,
May 28, 2009 at 9:59 pm
Yes of course Charles, re your last point. I suppose I tend to forget since I don’t have any independent bookshops near me. (There’s one on the other side of the city which I don’t get to often.) I do often order online from Jonathan at the Bookseller Crow – a fine independent with a great blog too.
Sam Jordison said,
May 29, 2009 at 7:17 am
Sounds great. Will seek it out and maybe try to blog soon…
Hugo said,
May 29, 2009 at 8:52 am
I’ve emailed John Self, but I also wanted to publicly thank him here for his efforts to promote my book. I’m touched, and very pleased that my novel is finally getting some of the consideration I’d always hoped it deserved. Thanks so much, John.
Mark Thwaite said,
May 29, 2009 at 9:08 am
Wilcken’s ‘Colony’! was sales rank 309,361, now 5,304, up 5,733%!!
http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/book/9780007106486/Colony
How exciting!
John Self said,
May 29, 2009 at 1:39 pm
Thanks Hugo and Sam. No pressure Sam, but if you blog it on the Guardian then that would be very good indeed!
Mark, I noticed that – it’s number 1 on your Fast Movers chart today!
julie street said,
May 29, 2009 at 1:52 pm
Just thought people might like to know that the author of “Colony” is not the Dr Hugo Wilcken pictured on Twitter… Photos of the real author available, I think, on the Harper Collins website…
julie street said,
May 29, 2009 at 1:59 pm
No, it appears that Harper Collins are not even up to speed on that… There’s a (fairly recent) photo of Hugo on his agent’s website A.M. Heath…
Mark Thwaite said,
May 29, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Erm Julie my link to the Dr Hugo photo was a joke… Evidently not a very good one!
John Self said,
May 29, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Well I liked it anyway Mark!
Thanks for the input Julie!
nicknick said,
May 29, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Sounds cool. I’ve done my part. Ordered!
Guy A. Savage said,
May 31, 2009 at 2:11 am
I joined the club. Between you and Max C. (Pechorin’s Journal), there goes my pocket money.
nicholas said,
May 31, 2009 at 9:10 am
I enjoyed the book when it first came out (and also the first one) but then I’m biased, being Hugo’s brother ‘n all. But it does strike me as a non-writer that there is a phenomenal amount of luck involved in whether you get noticed or sink without trace. Is there a search engine that could count the number of times a novel gets mentioned in blogs, in order to give some kind of “Readers’ League Table”? Rough and ready and of course corruptible, but if it got known it might provide some kind of counterbalance to Mr Dan Brown.
John Self said,
May 31, 2009 at 10:14 am
Thanks everyone. I should have set up some sort of commission deal really.
Nicholas, you could do a Google Blog Search, which throws up 9 results for Hugo Wilcken Colony. However most of these are links to this review, and it seems that this blog and Steve Mitchelmore’s This Space are the only ones which have written about the book.
JRSM said,
June 1, 2009 at 12:41 am
Been waiting for a paycheque to clear, and it just has, so I too have just bought ‘Colony’ from the Book Depository. Viva la Wilcken!
Daily Bookshot: Mr. Self Had Better Be Right - RobAroundBooks said,
June 1, 2009 at 3:51 pm
[...] is tenuous I know), if it weren’t for the evangelising of it by lit blogger John Self. On his Asylum blog, John [...]
PaulSweeney said,
June 2, 2009 at 7:07 am
Um hum. Yip. Ordering it.
Released from Captivity: Hugo Wilcken’s Colony « Asylum said,
June 11, 2009 at 8:02 am
[...] Wilcken Hugo at 8:00 am by John Self Two weeks ago I wrote about Hugo Wilcken’s second novel Colony, and was surprised and delighted by it. It’s a book of high literary ambition – fully [...]
Sarah said,
June 13, 2009 at 12:16 pm
Yep. I’m sold on this book. In fact I will even go so far as to bypass Amazon and investigate the Book Depository. However, when I admit that I rather like the book’s cover it might cast some doubt on my judgement, and somewhat reduce the value of the implied compliment…
John Self said,
June 14, 2009 at 11:00 am
That’s great Sarah; I hope you’ll like it and that you’ll return to let me know whether or not you did!
John Self said,
June 18, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Here is blogger Inside Books on Colony (more to come): link.
Trevor said,
June 19, 2009 at 1:08 pm
Fantastic book, John. I should have my review up next Monday, but I wanted to say thanks for pointing out the book and encouraging us to read it!
Trevor said,
June 20, 2009 at 2:33 am
John, any new information on sales for Colony?
John Self said,
June 21, 2009 at 1:19 pm
Yes Trevor. I’m pretty sure that total sales of Colony since I posted the above review have more than doubled (though that is from a very low base, according to Nielsen BookScan figures. As previously indicated, the book wasn’t so much published as dropped from a height). However because most of the purchases have been through Amazon Marketplace, whose sellers I don’t think are registered with Nielsen, most of these sales don’t show up in the official figures. The work goes on! Looking forward to reading your review.
Matt said,
June 29, 2009 at 2:59 pm
I’ve just finished this, slightly delirious in the battering heat… I enjoyed it a good deal and admired the clipped style and the obviously finely structured narrative. To me it was also a novel about trauma, and specifically WW1 trauma – all the central characters were in some way or another damaged or displaced by the war and like in so much WW1 fiction/non-fiction trauma had fractured time somehow, or assumed its own reality: outside of the usual modes of memory and self-narrative cohesion. Thus events, or at least the apprehension of the events, had been set in motion before those described in the book.
The other thing I’m surprised no one has mentioned is Ballard. To me the book had very strong Ballardian elements – especially around the notions of the boundaries of the self and landscape/environment, but also in the cryptic nature of surroundings, apparent decodings that lead nowhere…
I’m also kind of surprised that Steve was a fan as this had some of the elements of the ‘tyranny of narrative’ that I’ve seen him disparage – though with admittedly much left to float free and disperse.
All in all though, I enjoyed it a lot so cheers for the recommendation.
Matt
John Self said,
June 29, 2009 at 5:56 pm
Matt, I’m delighted you liked it, but even more delighted that you returned to share your thoughts. As to the ‘tyranny of narrative’, I think there is plenty of free-floatingness there which enables Wilcken’s book to escape that criticism. I’d commend a couple of reviews by people who haven’t posted here: this one and this one in particular.
Ballard is an interesting comparison. I will have to ponder that one.
Matt said,
June 30, 2009 at 8:45 am
I was thinking through the Ballard similarities last night and I think there is a good deal of Colony that follows Ballard’s externalisation of an inner landscape – a motif he adapted from the Surrealists. I think this fits Sabir’s character more snugly but it’s there in Manne also.
And to continue the odious comparisons, it also has elements of Coetzee’s The Life and Times of Michael K, although both texts have obviously different political connotations.
Anyway, enough of the rambling!
Cheers
Matt
JRSM said,
July 1, 2009 at 6:08 am
OK, I’ve just finished this as well. A wonderful book, as you said. I’m not sure that I have any central points to my thoughts, so just some observations to throw into the mix:
* I can definitely see where Matt’s coming from with the Ballard comparisons, though with Ballard it’s often the case that characters other than the ‘hero’/narrator, there not much sense of reality to them. In ‘Colony’, even though the secondary characters sometimes are stock types, as John said, they feel real.
* To add to the Ballard and Galgut and McCarthy and Beckett comparisons, I’ll add a couple of others: Camus’ Algerian-set stories, and the excellent early Simenon, ‘Tropic Moon’.
* Although Wilcken’s long UK and France residencies suggest he’s not hugely enamoured of his native Australia, I wonder if the colonial history here influenced his writing at all. Australia started as a similarly open penal settlement, with prisoners having freedom of movement (since where could they escape to?), but unlike the French colony here melting back into the tropical heat, Australia somehow survived and blossomed into a functioning society.
* Though I imagine Wilcken has never been a prisoner in a primitive penal colony, the authority with which he writes about life in one is incredibly convincing. So too is the strange backwardness of the place, so that the occasional intrusions of the Twentieth Century, like the biplane over the river, or talk of telephone lines, really strike the reader as forcefully strange. It’s odd thinking that back home in Sabir’s Paris, the Jazz Age is in full force.
I’ll stop wittering on here, but thanks for reviewing this book and bringing it to everybody’s attention. It’s great stuff. And everyone should read ‘The Execution’!
JRSM said,
July 1, 2009 at 11:15 pm
Er, by telephone, I mean gramophone. Sorry for the rambling nature of my comment–I jumped online immediately after finishing the book, all fired up, and made only limited amounts of sense.
Guy A. Savage said,
July 1, 2009 at 11:11 pm
I recently finished Colony and just posted my review. This is an absolutely marvellous book. I haven’t read everyone else’s reviews as I wanted to keep my mind clear of others’ thoughts.
Colony is one of the best books I’ve read this year, and I’m so impressed that I bought a couple of copies to send to friends.
I have to say, though, that it disturbs me that I’d never heard of this book–not a single peep. What a shame as Colony deserves so much more.
On another note, I bought a copy of The Execution.
So thanks for the recommendation.
Man Pearls « The Thriller in a Manila said,
July 2, 2009 at 10:49 pm
[...] meant I’ve had to read something worthwhile instead, Hugo Wilcken’s Colony, which, not to put too fine a point on it, was bloody good. “Joseph Conrad meets David [...]
L.J. Davis: A Meaningful Life « Asylum said,
July 7, 2009 at 8:03 am
[...] the background to the book and its rediscovery, “It came out and nothing happened.” (Hugo Wilcken, take heart.) There really is no excuse for this, as it’s the most miserably funny book [...]
Colony « The Cartesian Theatre Review said,
July 28, 2009 at 9:09 pm
[...] few months back the world’s most dedicated book blogger reviewed what he called an “exceptional” novel and began a mini-campaign to lift it [...]
John Self said,
August 3, 2009 at 9:38 am
Seoman, one of the winners in my draw for copies of Colony, posts his thoughts on the book here. Thanks for the review, seoman!
Books – Beauteous and Bountiful « Sarah’s Books said,
August 4, 2009 at 3:15 pm
[...] – Hugo Wilcken I admit it. I bought into the on-line hype, after one @john_self went on a crusade to promote the exposure of this under-rated book. However, he made the case [...]
Hugo Wilcken: Colony - World Literature Forum said,
August 10, 2009 at 12:29 am
[...] [...]
deucekindred said,
August 17, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Finally!
here’s my ‘Colony’ review
http://deucekindred.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/inbetweener-5-hugo-wilcken-colony/
John Self said,
August 18, 2009 at 11:14 am
Thanks for the link and for reviewing it, dk. I’m pleased too that you were so honest in your response. It’s interesting what you say about plot points requiring expansion: one of my favourite things about the book was Wilcken’s refusal to (what I considered to be) over-explain certain things, and to leave them brief – letting the reader fill in the detail. To each his own, and all that!
John Self said,
August 28, 2009 at 2:53 pm
A couple of reviews of Colony which I don’t think have been linked to here before: one from Simon at Inside Books; and one from Guy Savage at His Futile Preoccupations. Guy, you mentioned your review earlier but there was no link and I’d forgotten your blog address so didn’t see it until now!
Colony – Hugo Wilcken « Sarah’s Books said,
August 29, 2009 at 5:50 am
[...] – Hugo Wilcken There is a grand tradition, in the reviewing of this book, that you do not give spoilers. Which in one sense makes the whole [...]
Are book blogs and novellas made for each other? said,
September 20, 2009 at 8:00 pm
[...] John Self picked up and championed Colony by Hugo Wilcken, talking about it on Twitter and on his blog. Other people picked up the book and joined in the conversation, reviewing it themselves. (I tried, [...]
TwentyTen Challenge « Lizzy’s Literary Challenges said,
November 18, 2009 at 9:56 am
[...] to spring to mind are: The Flying Camel and the Golden Hump, recommended by Dovegreyreader and Colony, recommended at the [...]
Twelve from the Shelves: My Books of 2009 « Asylum said,
December 21, 2009 at 8:36 am
[...] Hugo Wilcken: Colony A scandalously overlooked novel from 2007 provided my greatest surprise of the year. A multilayered novel which teases as much as it satisfies, Colony should be a huge hit, but isn’t. The most admirable pleasure in this box of delights is Wilcken’s refusal to try to impress the reader: he creates a complex and memorable work from the most lucid prose. ”Only the past remains obscure. It hasn’t happened and perhaps it never will.” [...]
Joanne said,
December 30, 2009 at 5:24 am
Thanks for the wonderful recommendation. Just finished reading it and I would say it would be in my top five books read this year. I agree with you, John, that Wilcken didn’t feel the need to over explain or to spell everything out for the reader. This is a book that I will think about long after it is returned to my bookshelf. A worthy inclusion in your Twelve from the Shelves list for 2009.
John Self said,
December 30, 2009 at 11:31 am
I’m delighted you liked it, Joanne. I have held off reading Wilcken’s other novel The Execution so that I have something exciting to look forward to when there’s nothing else I want to read. I think he’s a significant talent, sadly overlooked at least in this country.
Father’s Day | The Casual Optimist said,
June 18, 2010 at 1:18 pm
[...] John Self, who has long championed the novel, had this to say about it: The book’s sometimes elusive nature seems to be reflected in the references to Poe’s Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym. But what impresses most is Wilcken’s unwillingness to try to impress the reader: the prose is unfussy, the scenes uncluttered. There is no ‘fine writing’. Instead, there is very fine writing indeed. [...]
PaulSweaeney said,
August 19, 2010 at 2:18 pm
Wow. It’s over a year since I bought it, and I just finished reading it. I really honestly don’t know what to make of it. The comparison to Damon Galgut (particularly The Good Doctor) is probably the closest for me.
John Self said,
August 20, 2010 at 9:07 am
Thanks Paul, I’m glad you got around to it and hope your comparison to Galgut is a positive one (as it is for me).
I believe Wilcken is nearing completion of his new novel, set (according to an interview Will Rycroft did with him) in 1940s New York. I look forward to that eagerly.
Papillon (1973) « watchingtop250 said,
February 8, 2013 at 12:00 pm
[...] I was also finding it all vaguely familiar and wondering whether I had in fact read the book and then forgotten that I’d done so. Subsequently I’ve discovered that I’d read a very similar book, Colony by Hugo Wilcken, and I’d definitely recommend it if you enjoy a spot of character development through suffering set in the tropics with a dash of je ne sais quoi hon-hi-hon alors! (Here’s another review of the book.) [...]